After a day of listening to presentations of immense depth of details, it was nice to have chance to chat with other conference attendees at Microsoft sponsored Gala dinner – although I was led astray by a Dutchman and a Pole.
The first talk I attended was presented by a guy who had reviewed 30million lines of code from open source projects to conclude the pre-processor is mostly a waste of time. The next presenter talked about a survey of practitioners understanding and use of (some) object oriented programming concepts. The survey was very large (3500+ responses), but the number of presented conclusions was very limited -
and the paper was probably better suited for education track. The last talk before lunch was by Microsoft researcher who rocked up with a Mac Book Pro (although running Windows 7). He presented their prototype CodeBook aimed at visualising the relationships between developers and their code. The aim was to help a developer identify other developers who may have written or otherwise knowledgeable about libraries or other parts of code used by the developer.
After lunch, I chose to attend the legal research track which although was interesting due my painful experiences from previous employments -
these sessions did take on a new level of geekness – and the general level of geekness was already pretty high…
On a more general note, almost no one refers to software architects as part of their talks – it is almost exclusively business analysts and developers as the only project roles considered. The main structure of the presented papers appear to have the following parts: 1) data gathering from field projects, 2) tool development and 3) trialling of the tool in the industry setting. The level of tool sophistication is slight concern for me, as people seem to have spend significant effort in developing pretty looking tools.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.